Friday Reading: New York Times on Implementing Urban Green Council Recommendations; Streetsblog on Walkable Streets

Friday afternoons. Can’t live with them, definitely (definitely) could not live without them. At the risk of further damaging your Friday PM productivity, we offer two longish, interesting reads for the weekend to come.

walkable streets gbnyc

Friday afternoons, man. Can’t live with them, definitely (definitely) could not live without them. This is probably not the best time to get into our long-gestating takedown of the New York Times’ Freakonomics blog’s feeble green building contrarianism, if only because you might be so distracted by the end of the work week that you wouldn’t be able to soak in all the brilliance. Or you’d rush through all the easy snark (mine) about easy snark (theirs). Anyway, next week. For now, we send you off into the weekend with two longish, interesting reads from two different places. That subject line might’ve been something of a spoiler alert, admittedly. Anyway:

In the New York Times, Nathanial Gronewold takes on New York City’s struggle to implement the Urban Green Council’s 111 ambitiously picayune recommendations, which we wrote about earlier this year:

Following 18 months of intense back-and-forth with industry, city lawyers and the general public, the green codes task force delivered its final report to Bloomberg and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn last February with little of the fanfare that accompanied other major announcements, such as tree planting targets and a stalled push to convert the city’s entire taxicab fleet to fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles. But the tedious code revisions envisioned by its report could add up to far greater changes to the city’s infrastructure over the next two decades than the four major bills passed in December, task force members say.

And from the mighty Streetsblog, Noah Kazis examines the first hesitant changes to the disastrous “green book” — the fraudulent urban planning bible that laid the faulty groundwork for years of crappy city planning — in a conversation with Walkable Streets’ Dan Burden.

One of the foundational documents in our country’s history of car-centric street design is what’s known as the Green Book. These engineering guidelines, which have been published in various editions by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) since the 1930s, are only “green” if you’re looking at the cover.

Enjoy the weekend, everyone. Back to regularly scheduled programming on Monday.

about gbNYC

gbNYC is a multi-disciplinary consulting and real estate services firm. In addition to representing office tenants and commercial buyers in leasing and acquisitions, we also provide innovative consulting solutions from a unique, green building perspective. We advise on green building financial incentives, comment on proposed green building marketing strategies, author white papers, treatises, and market analyses, organize seminars on the LEED process and professional accreditation, and provide advice and analysis on green building risk management and the overall state of green real estate, leasing, and construction, in New York City and beyond.

Our blog, the gbNYC+ journal of real estate, law, + sustainability, delivers consistent, original content - from a New York City perspective - on how technology, data, and sustainability are changing how we interact with our built environment. Subscribe below and receive new articles as they're published or connect with our social media presence to join our ongoing conversation about real estate and sustainability, in the Big Apple and beyond. Contact us at (201) 835-8530 or for more information about our services and to discuss how we can assist you.


One Response to Friday Reading: New York Times on Implementing Urban Green Council Recommendations; Streetsblog on Walkable Streets

  1. Hirotomo Nii Monday, May 3, 2010 at 12:17 pm #

    Please visit my blog Remodeling SF Bay Area; and Urban Ecology. Thank you.