Earlier today, the City Council passed the four pieces of legislation which Mayor Bloomberg introduced last April as his "Greener, Greater Buildings Plan." As you'll recall, building owners immediately opposed one of the bills (Int. 967: Audits & Retrocommissioning), which would have required them to implement a bundle of energy efficiency upgrades with a payback period of less than five years after the results of a rolling audit process. While auditing remains part of the approved legislation, owners will not be required to make the improvements, which will now just be identified based on a "reasonable" payback period. Public buildings, however, must still install any retrofit measure that the audit pegs with less than a seven-year payback. Although the costs of auditing were noted by opponents to the bills earlier this year, mandatory energy audits are now required every ten years, though buildings certified under LEED-EB and Energy Star are exempt.
The other three bills are Int. 564: New York City Energy Conservation Code, Int. 476: Benchmarking, and Int. 973, Lighting Retrofits and Submetering. This latter piece of legislation is particularly important to note from a leasing perspective; increasing the data available to landlords and tenants about how energy is being used in multi-tenant commercial buildings should assist brokers and attorneys in crafting provisions that address the split incentive, as well as encourage tenants (who will receive a monthly energy use statement) to reduce their overall consumption. Even with the revisions, bill sponsor James Gennaro and the city's long-term planning and sustainability director Rohit Aggarwala are calling the legislation "the single most aggressive environmental plan undertaken by any American city." The legislation is significant and we're looking forward to watching its implementation and ultimate impact in the marketplace as we move into 2010.


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Google
Comments
Mandatory Audit of private property violates liberty
A mandatory energy audit of private property violates the liberty of property owners.
The amount of electricity a property owner purchases and consumes is none of the City's business and even less so if Consolidated Edison is a regulated monopoly.
This mandatory energy audit is just as insidious as Austin Texas' Energy Conservation and Disclosure Audit ordinance.
This creeping statism to stop a harmless atmospheric trace gas is laughable, and a misallocation of resources, time and capital.
Energy efficiency control freaks will never be satisfied. Wait until they discover cars with V8 engines "produce too much carbon".
Maybe you'll speak out when they get thosee outlawed too?
John Barksdale
http://stoptheaustinecad.blogspot.com
identitythefthurts@gmail.com
Constitutional Law Problems with Green Building Legislation
We've actually written about this previously here at gbNYC; take a look through our archives, particularly with respect to Babylon, Long Island's LEED-driven building code and the ongoing performance problems with LEED buildings generally.
Post new comment